🧠 Master's Thesis · Pompeu Fabra University
The Point of No Return in Action Cancellation
When you decide to move, there's a critical moment—about 200ms before the action—when it becomes impossible to cancel. This research explores how that "point of no return" shapes your feeling of control.
The Big Idea
🧠 Sense of Agency (SoA)
The feeling "I did that"—the subjective experience of controlling your actions. It's what makes voluntary movement feel different from a reflex.
⏱️ Point of No Return
Research shows there's a critical moment ~200ms before you act when canceling becomes impossible. Your brain has committed, even if your finger hasn't moved yet.
🔗 The Connection
Does crossing this "point of no return" shape how much control you feel afterward? That's what this research investigates.

Hypothesis
Main Prediction
Once you pass the "point of no return," your brain treats the action as already initiated—even before you physically move. This means if an outcome happens within that ~200ms window, you'll still feel strong agency. But if the outcome comes before that point, your sense of control drops.

🎯 Testing the Idea
Use a Brain-Computer Interface to detect when someone intends to act, then trigger an outcome at different times. Measure how much control they feel in each case.
💡 Why It Matters
Understanding this helps us design better BCIs, prosthetics, and human-machine systems where timing affects whether users feel in control—or feel the system is controlling them.
Approach

Stage 1: Train the System ✅
Record EEG while people press a button whenever they want. Use machine learning to detect the "pre-movement" brain pattern that predicts an action is coming.
Stage 2: Test Agency (Planned)
Use the trained system in real-time. When it detects intention, trigger a sound at varying times before the actual button press. Ask: "How much did you feel you caused that sound?"
Stage 1: Data Collection & Training

How the Classifier Works


Stage 2: Real-Time Experiment (Planned)

Technical Summary
- Brain signals: EEG from motor areas of the brain
- AI method: Regularized Linear Discriminant Analysis (RLDA)
- Speed: 20ms updates (fast enough to catch the ~200ms window)
- Personalization: Each person gets their own trained classifier
Results (Stage 1)
🎯 High Accuracy
Average: 90.7% correct detection
The system successfully learned to predict when someone was about to press a button, just from their brain activity—before they moved.
⚡ Fast Enough for Real-Time
Classifier updates every 20ms, making it feasible to detect intentions and trigger outcomes within the critical ~200ms window.
✅ Ready for Stage 2
5 participants trained successfully. System validated for real-time operation. Next step: test the agency hypothesis with variable outcome timing.

✅ Proof of Concept Successful
We can reliably detect intention before action using non-invasive EEG and machine learning. The system is ready to test how timing affects sense of agency.
Why This Matters
🤖 Better BCIs
Brain-computer interfaces that act too fast might make users feel out of control. Understanding agency timing helps design systems that feel natural.
🧠 Understanding Agency
Provides evidence that the "point of no return" isn't just about action cancellation—it may be the moment when your brain marks an action as "mine."
⚖️ Ethics & Responsibility
Who's responsible when a BCI acts on detected intentions? Understanding agency timing is crucial for legal and ethical frameworks.
Master's Thesis
Hamed Ghane · Supervised by Prof. Salvador Soto Faraco
MSc Brain and Cognition · Pompeu Fabra University · July 2023